Qniverse
  • Home
  • Quantum Vibes
  • Webinar
  • Documentation
  • Register
  • Log In
Select Page

User Guide

14
  • Introduction to Qniverse
  • Creating an Account
  • Profile & Account
  • Quantum Gates
  • Measurement on Basis(x,y,z)
  • Circuit Composer Area
  • Code Editor Area
  • Building Circuits
  • Compute Resources
  • Backend Systems
  • Running Circuits
  • Visualization
  • View Jobs
  • Launch Notebook

QSDK

25
  • Gates Palette
    • Gates Palette
  • Algorithms
    • Simon’s Algorithm
    • Bernstein-Vazirani Algorithm
    • Deutsch Function
    • Deutsch-Jozsa Algorithm
    • Grover’s Algorithm(Search)
    • Quantum Teleportation
    • Super Dense Coding
    • Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE)
    • Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT)
    • Shor’s Algorithm
    • Quantum Walks Algorithm(1D)
    • Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE)
    • Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd(HHL) Algorithm
    • Quantum Veto Algorithm
    • QSVM
    • QKMeans Algorithm
    • Quantum Private Comparison(QPC) Algorithm
    • QuantumKNN Algorithm
    • QEC : Three-Qubit Repetition Code
    • QEC : Shor’s Nine-Qubit Code
    • Quantum Hierarchical Clustering(QHC)
    • Quantum Perceptron Algorithm
    • Quantum Principal Component Analysis (QPCA)
    • QNN Algorithm

FAQ and Troubleshooting

2
  • Bug Report/Feedback
  • Terms & Privacy
View Categories
  • Home
  • Docs
  • QSDK
  • Algorithms
  • Quantum Principal Component Analysis (QPCA)

Quantum Principal Component Analysis (QPCA)

6 min read

Quantum Principal Component Analysis (QPCA) is a hybrid dimensional-reduction algorithm that translates the covariance structure of classical data into a quantum density matrix and then employs Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) to extract its eigenvalues. By simulating the unitary (where the density matrix is, QPCA can reveal the principal components of a data set while potentially leveraging quantum parallelism for speed-ups on large, high-dimensional data.

 

Presenting here with a video tour of how the  QPerceptron Algorithm works

https://qniverse.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/QPerceptron-Algo.mp4

 

 

How Quantum PCA Differs from Classical PCA #

Classical PCA diagonalises a covariance matrix on a classical computer, typically in time for d features, returning eigenvectors and eigenvalues that quantify variance.
QPCA instead:

  • Encodes the normalised covariance matrix as a quantum density matrix.
  • Evolves that matrix under a simulated Hamiltonian to obtain a unitary operator.
  • Applies Quantum Phase Estimation to recover phase angles proportional to the eigenvalues.
  • Reconstructs principal-component variances from measured ancilla statistics.

The quantum-enhanced subroutines replace matrix diagonalisation with potentially poly-logarithmic depth circuits, shifting the computational bottleneck to state preparation and QPE rather than classical eigen decomposition.

 

How Quantum PCA Can Be Implemented #

  1. Data Normalisation and Preparation
    • Convert raw numeric (or one-hot-encoded) data into a matrix X.
    • Standardise each feature to zero mean and unit variance.
  2. Density-Matrix Construction
    • Compute the classical covariance matrix   
    • Normalise to a valid density matrix 
  3. Hamiltonian Simulation
    • Exponentiate the density matrix: 
    • Pad to the nearest power-of-two dimension so that U acts on an integer number of qubits.
  4. Quantum Phase Estimation
    • Allocate ancilla qubits to store eigen-phase estimates.
    • Apply controlled powers U^2^k conditioned on each ancilla.
    • Perform the inverse Quantum Fourier Transform on the ancilla register.
  5. Measurement & Eigenvalue Extraction
    • Measure ancilla qubits to obtain bit-strings representing phase angles ϕj​.
    • Recover eigenvalues via   .
  6. Post-Processing
    • Sort eigenvalues, compute percentage variance explained, and (optionally) reconstruct eigenvectors classically if full loading is feasible.

 

Advantages and Disadvantages Compared to the Classical Counterpart #

 

Advantages #

  • Exponential Feature Space Representation – Encoding the covariance matrix as a quantum state embeds dd-dimensional statistics into a 2^n -2^n-dimensional Hilbert space (with n =[log2d]), letting a relatively small qubit register capture correlations that would require massive classical memory.
  • Poly-logarithmic Eigenvalue Estimation – Quantum Phase Estimation extracts eigenvalues in O(poly logd) depth under fault-tolerant assumptions, versus classical eigen decomposition, offering asymptotic speed-ups on very large feature sets.
  • Spectral‐Gap Amplification – Phase amplitudes scale with the eigenvalue gap, allowing rare-variance directions to be distinguished more cleanly than in floating-point classical PCA, which can suffer from numerical round-off.
  • Privacy Preservation Through Quantum States – Because only aggregated density-matrix statistics are uploaded to the quantum back-end, raw records remain on-prem, providing an intrinsic data-obfuscation layer.
  • Hybrid Synergy – QPCA slots into classical analytics pipelines: state preparation and result interpretation stay classical, while the expensive diagonalisation step is offloaded to quantum hardware, minimising refactor cost for existing workflows.

 

Disadvantages #

  • State-Preparation Bottleneck – Constructing σ requires O(nd^2) classical time and memory O(d^2), then converts it into quantum amplitudes via O(d) controlled rotations; this overhead can eclipse the quantum speed-up for moderate problem sizes.
  • Deep-Circuit Requirements – QPE needs coherent application of U^2k for k ancilla bits; depth grows exponentially with precision, demanding fault-tolerant qubits well beyond today’s NISQ limits.
  • Noise-Induced Phase Uncertainty – Gate and read-out errors blur measured phases, collapsing small eigenvalues into sampling noise and requiring heavy error-mitigation or repetition.
  • Eigenvector Recovery Still Classical – QPCA returns eigen-values natively; reconstructing eigen-vectors generally needs classical post-processing (or additional tomography), limiting full quantum advantage.
  • Parameter-Sensitivity – Poor choices of evolution time t or ancilla precision cause eigen-phase aliasing; tuning these hyperparameters often falls back on classical grid-search.
  • Limited Demonstrated Scale – Published demonstrations remain on small (≤ 8-qubit) simulators; no public hardware run has yet beaten classical PCA time-to-solution on real-world data.

 

Real-World Applications #

 

Domain   Quantum Benefit Example Use-Case
Finance & Risk Analytics Faster extraction of latent risk factors from large correlation matrices (10⁴–10⁵ assets) Real-time portfolio Value-at-Risk stress testing
Genomics & Proteomics Handles 10⁵-dimensional gene-expression vectors where classical PCA is memory-bound Identifying principal pathways in single-cell RNA-seq data
Climate & Remote Sensing Compresses multi-spectral satellite imagery with hundreds of bands per pixel Generating low-rank climate anomaly maps for extreme-weather prediction
Recommender Systems Quantum speed-up over matrix factorisation for user-item interaction matrices Producing latent user factors for streaming-media recommendations
Cybersecurity Detects variance shifts in high-dimensional network-traffic feature sets Early anomaly detection in zero-trust enterprise networks
Drug Discovery Reduces millions-dimensional molecular fingerprints to tractable latent spaces Similarity search for candidate compounds against huge libraries
Industrial IoT Compresses heterogeneous sensor streams into few principal health indicators Real-time fault diagnosis in smart-factory equipment
Quantum Chemistry Uses QPCA as a subroutine to compress quantum states themselves Identifying dominant electronic configurations in variational eigensolvers

 

 

Overview #

The QPCA_Qniverse implementation delivers a full pipeline for quantum-assisted principal-component extraction inside the Qniverse SDK. Core functionality resides in the QuantumPCA class, while QuantumDimensionalityReducer wraps automated data handling, mixed-type detection (numeric, categorical, mixed), and CSV integration.

Key Components and Features

  • Quantum Density-Matrix Builder
    Constructs a normalised covariance matrix and rescales it to trace-one for valid state preparation.
  • Hamiltonian Simulation via expm
    Uses SciPy’s matrix exponential to obtain later embedded into a power-of-two unitary.
  • Flexible Quantum Phase Estimation
    User-selectable ancilla count (num_ancilla) and shot count (shots=None for analytic mode).
  • Automatic Matrix Padding
    Pad non-power-of-two matrices with identity blocks, ensuring qubit-register compatibility.
  • Unified Interface for PCA, MCA, FAMD
    Sub-classes (QuantumMCA, QuantumFAMD) share the same quantum core while differing in upstream encoding.
  • Restricted-Mode Safety
    Guards against excessive sample counts (>30) to remain simulation-feasible on commodity hardware.
  • CSV Autogeneration Helper
    In-memory data is saved to a temporary CSV and reloaded, illustrating end-to-end real-world usage.

 

End-to-End Workflow #

  1. Initialisation – Instantiate QuantumDimensionalityReducer (optionally set method).
  2. Data Loading – Pass a 2-D list, NumPy array, or Pandas DataFrame (or an on-disk CSV path).
  3. Pre-Processing – Automatic type detection, scaling, and one-hot encoding for categorical variables.
  4. Quantum PCA Execution – Run perform_quantum_pca() with chosen ancilla bits, evolution time, and shots.
  5. Result Aggregation – Receive density matrix, unitary, measurement histogram, eigenvalues, and metadata in a single dictionary.
  6. Interpretation – Use QuantumDimensionalityReducer.print_results() for human-friendly insights.

 

Getting Started in Qniverse #

from qniverse.algorithms import QuantumDimensionalityReducer

# Example: Iris data (first 30 rows for simulation feasibility)

reducer = QuantumDimensionalityReducer()

results = reducer.reduce_from_csv(

data=[

[“sepal_length”,”sepal_width”,”petal_length”,”petal_width”,”species”],

[“5.1”, “3.5”, “1.4” , “0.2”, “setosa”],

# … (up to 30 samples)

],

target_column “species”,

num_ancilla=3,

evolution_time=1.0,

shots=None   # analytic mode

)

reducer.print_results(results)

The results dictionary now contains eigenvalues approximating the principal-component variances and the measurement distribution used to obtain them.

 

Understanding the Parameters #

Parameter Purpose
num_ancilla Bits of precision in QPE; more bits ⇒ finer eigen-value resolution (at increased circuit depth).
evolution_time (t) Scales the simulated Hamiltonian; choose tt so that eigen-phases fall within (0,2π)(0, 2\pi).
shots Number of circuit executions. None uses exact probability amplitudes; finite shots introduce sampling noise.
restricted_mode Limits datasets to 30 samples to avoid excessive simulation times on CPUs.

 

Hyperparameter Tuning #

Although QPCA lacks a discrete k parameter, users can experimentally adjust:

  • Ancilla Count – Trade precision for depth; typical range 3–6 qubits.
  • Evolution Time–Scale t to spread eigen-phases; a heuristic is
  • Sampling Strategy – Use analytic mode during development; switch to finite shots to model real-device noise.

 

Evaluation Metrics and Plot History

QPCA returns raw eigenvalues sorted by measurement frequency. Suggested classical follow-up metrics include:

  • Explained Variance Ratio –>
  • Cumulative Variance –> Determine how many components capture, say, 95 % of total variance.

No plotting is performed automatically; however, the returned eigenvalues can be visualised with conventional Scree plots.

 

Conclusion #

QuantumPCA offers an insightful bridge between classical covariance analysis and quantum computational primitives. By embedding the covariance structure into a quantum circuit and leveraging QPE, users can explore dimensionality reduction from a quantum vantage point today, while remaining compatible with future fault-tolerant hardware advances. Integrate QPCA into your Qniverse workflows to evaluate quantum readiness for your high-dimensional analytics tasks.

Quantum Perceptron AlgorithmQNN Algorithm
Table of Contents
  • How Quantum PCA Differs from Classical PCA
  • How Quantum PCA Can Be Implemented
  • Advantages and Disadvantages Compared to the Classical Counterpart
    • Advantages
    • Disadvantages
  • Real-World Applications
  • Overview
  • End-to-End Workflow
  • Getting Started in Qniverse
  • Understanding the Parameters
  • Hyperparameter Tuning
  • Conclusion

GET IN TOUCH

Ready to Get Started?

Have a query or a feedback? Reach out to us to learn more about the Qniverse and we will be in touch with you at the earliest.



qniverse [at] cdac [dot] in

C-DAC

Copyright © 2025, C-DAC, All rights reserved.

Developed and maintained by Quantum Technology Group, C-DAC Bengaluru

Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Govt. of India

Brochure
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy